Swagger Like Us: Why the Future of TA Belongs To Talent Intelligence
Posted on August 12, 2025 4 Comments
“Talent” and “intelligence” might be the ultimate oxymoron. It’s rare that these two seemingly divergent concepts don’t usually show up in the same sentence (at least, without irony).
For years, workforce decisions have been driven more by gut feel, outdated job descriptions, and whichever résumé floated to the top of the ATS that morning.
The result? Hiring managers still cling to irrelevant requirements like a toddler with a security blanket. Recruiters spend days chasing “passive candidates” who were never really interested in the first place. HR tries to predict future skill needs based on reports that were already outdated when they were published.
And then everyone acts shocked when critical roles sit open for months or top performers vanish overnight.
But here’s the truth: talent intelligence is not an oxymoron. And unlike “artificial intelligence,” it’s not some amorphous concept or meaningless buzzword. I know – my lack of cynicism towards this topic feels a little weird to me, too – but still.
Talent Intelligence (unlike, say, skills based hiring) is not only a real thing, but it’s also really important, too – in fact, it’s one of the most imperative capabilities a modern TA or HR function can have.
Read MoreEmployer of Record: Solution or Shell Game?
Posted on August 6, 2025 Leave a Comment
There’s a new acronym in town that every HR tech vendor is frantically adding to their pitch deck (and no, it’s not “AI”). It’s EOR, short for Employer of Record. Which is about as sexy as it sounds, if we’re being honest.
Here’s the basic pitch: you want to hire some hotshot engineer in Germany or a growth hacker in Brazil, but you don’t want to set up a legal entity, figure out foreign tax law, or accidentally trigger an audit.
EOR platforms, like Rippling, Remote, Papaya Global, Multiplier, and literally hundreds of other lookalikes, step in as the legal employer on your behalf, handling payroll, compliance, benefits, and all the messy bureaucratic stuff you’d rather ignore.
Sounds awesome, right?
Read MoreWinston Goes to Walldorf: SAP Acquires SmartRecruiters’ AI and Ambition
Posted on August 1, 2025 3 Comments
Here’s a headline I didn’t expect to write this year (or ever, if we’re being honest). But it’s true.
SAP is acquiring SmartRecruiters.
And for once, in a sea of misguided “strategic tuck-ins” and overpriced AI fluff, this actually makes sense. For everyone.
Candidates. Recruiters. SAP. Hell, even SuccessFactors might finally be able to recruit without a manual.
This isn’t one of those acquisitions where a flailing legacy platform absorbs a scrappy little startup and slowly strangles the innovation out of it.
If SAP plays this right, it could actually turn the recruiting tech market on its head—and maybe, just maybe, fix the trainwreck that is enterprise hiring in the process.
Read MoreIncompetency Framework: The Truth About Skills Based Hiring
Posted on July 30, 2025 3 Comments
If you’ve been to an HR tech conference lately, sat through a VC pitch deck, or made the mistake of opening LinkedIn during business hours, then congratulations.
You’ve already been force-fed the gospel of “skills-based hiring.”
It’s 2025, and apparently we’ve all collectively decided that job titles, experience, and education don’t matter anymore. All that matters is “skills.”
Skills, we’re told, are the great equalizer. The future of work is a meritocracy where resumes don’t matter, degrees are obsolete, and anyone who can prove they’ve mastered the right blend of Power BI, emotional intelligence, and generative AI prompt engineering gets the job.
It sounds great – until you realize, like most other talent trends, it’s mostly theater (of the absurd).
Because here’s the thing: skills-based hiring, for all its promise, is fundamentally flawed. Not just flawed in practice, but flawed in premise, too.
The truth is, skills, as they’re currently defined and implemented in most HR systems and hiring processes, are too subjective, too fluid, and too dependent on context to serve as a stable foundation for hiring.
Read More




